ICWA and SCOTUS

For only the second time, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear a case involving the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).  This Reuters article describes the situation as a "human tragedy," which pretty much can describe any case on appeal involving ICWA, as the failure to abide by ICWA's mandates can essentially 'undo' an adoption.

Whatever the result, it will be wonderful for attorneys involved in these types of cases to have a little more guidance from the Supreme Court.

Trauma

Trauma seems to be the new hot button issue for those who work in the child welfare system.  So...what exactly is trauma?  The definition that I received at the session on Polyvictimization and Child Trauma at the National Association of Counsel for Children (NACC) conference is as follows (and note that this definition is geared toward children, but is more broadly applicable):
- extraordinary experience that threatens the life or physical integrity of a child or of someone important to that child
- this extraordinary experience causes overwhelming sense of terror, helplessness, and horror
- this extraordinary experience produces intense physical effects.

Okay, but we all know that those who are involved in the child welfare system, whether they are parents or children, have experienced some truly awful things.  Why is trauma as a concept so important for us to consider and look for?  A study called the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study found that childhood trauma results in a reduction of life expectancy of 19 years.  This is a big deal.  Nineteen years can mean the difference between seeing your child graduate from college or get married, or meeting a grandchild.

So how do we know whether the experiences are just a bad thing (or a series of bad things) that happened to a person, or whether they constitute a trauma, which the person may need assistance in dealing with?  We look for symptoms, such as diagnoses of PTSD, ODD, bipolar disorder, ADD, ADHD, and conduct disorder.  Other symptoms besides diagnoses include avoidance, feeling numb or disengaged, hyperarousal or emotional/behavioral agitation, re-experiencing, feelings of powerlessness and helplessness, and feelings of hyper-vigilance.  These types of symptoms may also be a clue that there is an underlying trauma, if you were not already aware of the trauma and were only aware of the diagnoses.

Once you are aware of the types of symptoms listed above, and that there may be trauma underlying those symptoms, it is key to conduct a trauma assessment, which is more in-depth and is different from a routine general mental health treatment.  The person conducting a trauma assessment should be a mental health provider with training on trauma.  The assessment is intended to determine whether the child (or person) needs trauma focused treatment.

So why am I writing about trauma on a blog that is not necessarily geared toward other attorneys and professionals in the child welfare system (although I certainly welcome them to read as well!)?  Because anyone can look for trauma and recognize some of the symptoms of trauma and then assist the person to obtain an assessment and trauma-focused treatment, if necessary.  And because 19 years is a really big deal.

Thanks to the presenters at the NACC Conference on this topic, as well as the National Child Traumatic Stress Network, Child Welfare Committee for the resources for this post.

Juvenile Law: Nebraska v. South Dakota

As an attorney who was first licensed in South Dakota, and who practiced there before moving to Nebraska, I grew accustomed to South Dakota procedures in different types of cases.  As a result, becoming acquainted with how things are done in Nebraska has been an adjustment and a definite learning experience.  Juvenile law is one area where there are definite differences between Nebraska and South Dakota.  Here are just a few of the differences between the two states, and my opinion on which is superior.  

SD: Different types of cases involving juveniles (abuse & neglect, juvenile delinquency, child in need of supervision, etc.) each have their own chapter of the Code, and as a result, have slightly different procedures.

NE:  Different types of cases involving juveniles are all handled under one section of the Code, and therefore have uniform procedures.

Winner: NE.  It's really nice that the cases all have identical procedures, so that the attorneys and participants in the case cannot get tripped up by some minor difference in the procedures for different types of cases.  

SD: Child's attorney appointed to represent the interests of the child in an abuse & neglect case.  Child's attorney is an attorney for the child who also advocates the best interests of the child (as they quite often are the same thing), although a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) may be appointed if the child's stated interests appear to differ from the best interests of the child.  

NE: GAL appointed to represent the interests of the child in an abuse & neglect case.  GAL represents the best interests of the child, and an additional attorney may be appointed if the child's stated interests appear to differ from the best interests of the child.  

Winner: These are essentially equivalent, although just the reverse of one another.  

SD: Department of Social Services (DSS) prepares a Report to the Court before every hearing.  The Child's Attorney does not prepare a Report to the Court.  

NE: GAL prepares a Report to the Court before every hearing.  The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) does not prepare a Report to the Court.  

Winner: Neither state wins.  There are benefits to both systems, and therefore I would recommend that both states adopt a requirement that DSS/HHS & the GAL/Child's Attorney prepare Reports to the Court.  HHS has information such as completion of parenting classes, treatment information from parents, as well as information about contacts with the parents, that is valuable for the parties, attorneys, and the judge to consider.  However, the GAL is more of an impartial outsider to the case than is DSS/HHS, and therefore is in a better position to make recommendations to the judge as to what should happen in the case going forward.  In addition, because the GAL is an attorney, and the social worker is not an attorney, the GAL is in a better position to review the law applicable to the case & ensure that it is complied with.  

SD: The State's Attorney represents DSS's interests and may require DSS to take action.

NE: The County Attorney does not represent HHS's interests, and HHS may bring in its own attorney if HHS's recommendations are in conflict with those of the County Attorney.  

Winner: South Dakota.  SD's procedure here is much cleaner and smoother.  It makes much more sense to have the County Attorney, who represents the interests of the State on a daily basis, advocate the position of a state agency.  Likewise, it makes sense for the County Attorney to have some control over the actions of the state agency prior to the case being heard before the judge.  

So as you can see, there are differences between how juvenile cases are handled in Nebraska and South Dakota.  There are benefits to the systems of each state, as well as reasons for the different approaches.  It also makes clear how important it is to be represented by an attorney familiar with these procedures.